Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 7 results ...

Aliakbarlou, S, Wilkinson, S and Costello, S B (2017) Exploring construction client values and qualities: Are these two distinct concepts in construction studies?. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(03), 234-52.

De Silva, N, Weerasinghe, R P N P, Madhusanka, H W N and Kumaraswamy, M (2017) Relationally integrated value networks for total facilities management. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(03), 313-29.

Kamara, J M (2017) Maintaining focus on clients’ requirements using the DQI tool: Towards a requirements-oriented project process. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(03), 271-83.

Kumaraswamy, M, Mahesh, G, Mahalingam, A, Loganathan, S and Kalidindi, S N (2017) Developing a clients’ charter and construction project KPIs to direct and drive industry improvements. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(03), 253-70.

Pärn, E A and Edwards, D (2017) Vision and advocacy of optoelectronic technology developments in the AECO sector. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(03), 330-48.

Schultz, A L (2017) Integrating lean and visual management in facilities management using design science and action research. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(03), 300-12.

Weerasinghe, R P N P and Sandanayake, Y G (2017) Collaborative facilities management model: Sri Lankan perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(03), 284-99.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: core business,information,facilities management,ownership,collaborative facilities management model,facility services,geographical location,utilities/infrastructure
  • ISBN/ISSN:
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-02-2016-0004
  • Abstract:
    This paper develops a collaborative facilities management (CFM) model incorporating facilities management functions that can be shared and performed collaboratively by organisations, revealing that core business, geographical location and ownership are identified as the key dimensions that affect CFM concept.